Beijing hit the table on Wednesday and threatened retaliation for approval by the United States Senate of a bill that would empower the Donald Trump government to sanction Chinese officials that considers responsible for the repression of the protests in Hong Kong.
The project is similar to one approved in mid-October by the US House of Representatives, so both houses must now agree on a single version, which Trump has not yet said whether to subscribe or not.
The Chinese Government – through seven official bodies in total – he reacted angrily to this initiative, which according to Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang "obviates the facts, employs a double standard and shamelessly interferes with the internal affairs of China."
In another statement, Foreign indicated that it has convened the Minister Counselor of Political Affairs of the US embassy in China, WIlliam Klein, to file a formal complaint and a strong protest.
China also threatened to "strong reprisals" with consequences for the US if Trump finally takes the law forward.
The legislation would require Washington to assess whether events in Hong Kong merit a change in the status of commercial preference it now enjoys, and would contemplate sanctions against Chinese officials responsible for human rights violations as arbitrary detentions, torture, forced confessions or extrajudicial deliveries, among others.
But according to Beijing's reading, "the current situation in Hong Kong has nothing to do with human rights or democracy."
"The question is end violence once, restore order and guarantee the rule of law in Hong Kong, "said Geng.
"The reality is that (protesters) have destroyed and set fire to facilities, attacked innocent civilians and police officers, and forcibly occupied university campuses, all in a premeditated manner," he added.
A hidden agenda
China considers that the approval of the law exposes the clear "the hidden political agenda of the United States" by masking "criminals" as defenders of human rights and democracy, according to Geng.
The spokesman asked the US to "clearly assess the situation" and "stop his wrongdoing before it is too late."
The Chinese press also threw firewood and the nationalist newspaper Global times lashed out at the "nonsense" of this law: "It is self-destructive and endangers American companies in Hong Kong with one sole purpose: to threaten the Chinese government to give in," said Shen Yi, an associate professor at the School of International Relations at Fudan University.
The crisis continues in Hong Kong
Meanwhile, the last crisis unleashed in Hong Kong last week following a general strike has resulted in serious clashes on campus like the one at the Polytechnic University, where dozens of young activists still remain locked for the fourth consecutive day.
The police continue the siege and have ensured that will stop all the people who remain inside, and that he will accuse them of causing disturbances, regardless of the purpose of their meeting.
Between Monday night and Wednesday morning, about eight hundred people – three hundred of them minors – they left campus.
It's not clear exactly how many are inside, but the Hong Kong Commercial Radio calculates the number in About a hundred.
It is believed that half a thousand of those who left the campus have been arrested, although the police have not yet announced the exact number of detainees.
The siege began on Sunday afternoon, a violent day in which protesters, armed with bricks and Molotov cocktails, were involved in violent street battles with riot police, which fired tear gas and rubber balls.
This Wednesday were held calls to paralyze public transport and city communication routes but the call was not very successful and the day passed relatively quiet.
The demonstrations in Hong Kong began in June following a controversial extradition bill, already withdrawn by the Government, but they have mutated into a movement that seeks an improvement in Hong Kong's democratic mechanisms and an opposition to the increasing interference of Beijing.
For months, some activists have opted for more radical tactics than peaceful protest and violent clashes with the police are common.